Is it really waterproof?
Waterproofing failure in buildings comes at a huge cost and the extent of damage is often extreme. Dimi Kyriakou speaks to members of the waterproofing industry to find out where builders are going wrong in this area and their recommendations for best practice.
According to the insurance industry, waterprooﬁng failure is one of the biggest dollar-item claims. It is also a major cause of residential building disputes due to failed or poorly installed water membranes to shower recesses, balconies, rooftops and other wet areas.
Disputes aside, it can also be very costly for a builder to identify the source of the water ingress and ﬁx the problem, which can severely aﬀect your reputation and your bottom line. The work involved to rectify the issue is not always straightforward either: it often involves destructive investigation, the cost of all remedial works and rectifying all damages caused by the water ingress. The contractor may also be held accountable for any of the owner’s ﬁnancial costs if it is determined that their work was at fault.
This makes waterprooﬁng one of the most complex of trade issues and arguably the biggest problem facing the industry – this is supported by the number of companies that exist solely to ﬁxing waterprooﬁng failures.
So where are the mistakes being made and how can you prevent these recurring issues from appearing in your project once it has been signed oﬀ?
The Australian Institute of Waterprooﬁ ng aims to bring professionalism into the waterprooﬁng industry and train people in the appropriate methods of waterprooﬁng in buildings. Chairman Barry Tanner says that, given the potential damage that a water leak can do to a building, it is not a process that any tradie should take lightly.
“There are many civil disputes as well as millions of dollars paid out each year from insurance companies for claims on water ingress in buildings,” Barry explains.
“Because it is so expensive, we need to train builders, architects and other professionals in the building industry so they understand more about the methodology and the detailing of what is required to waterproof our buildings.”
Angus Kell is a qualiﬁed architect in New South Wales and the manager at CSR DesignLink. He is adamant that before builders even set foot onto a site, they should have a good understanding of the minimum requirements within the National Construction Code (NCC) and relevant Australian Standards, as they are responsible for ensuring compliance on both a national and state level.
“This means having an understanding of the surrounding materials. It’s not just the waterprooﬁng compounds themselves, but also the substrate and ﬁnishes,” he explains.
“You also need to have an understanding about the way the building works – a waterprooﬁng membrane is really only as good as the substrate that it’s sitting on. If you don’t have a good foundation and the building moves later on, it is very likely that the substrate will move, the linings will move and the waterprooﬁng membranes will break. This risk is increased in humid and cooler temperatures so if you don’t maintain the installation with good exhaust fans, there is a high likelihood that you’re going to have issues.”
Even now, much confusion arises from the ‘water resistant’ versus ‘waterproof’ debate. The easiest way to look at it is that a water resistant product or material will be able to withstand minor splashing, whereas a waterproof product or material will act like a plastic bag that won’t allow water to deteriorate it. Getting the two confused can often lead to the inappropriate choice of substrate, which Angus says is detrimental to the overall waterprooﬁng installation.
“In the old days we used a lot of chipboard as the ﬂooring material in the substrate in timber framed constructions. While there are some water resistant chipboards around, when this particular material gets wet, it can cause many problems. Once it starts to swell up and the integrity of that board breaks down, it can lead to ongoing issues as it creates further damage to the building structure.”
Another issue surrounds a lack of understanding in how water enters building and how it should be dealt with.
This often leads to inadequate falls, which can mean that water ponds behind a toilet or even goes out the bathroom door to the rest of the building. And before you laugh and think it’s ridiculous for anyone to do that, Angus says mistakes like these happen more often than not.
“You see these cases all the time and funnily enough in high rise construction, if you ask any of the builders they’ll tell you that waterprooﬁng bathrooms is one of their major defects. It only takes one tiny little thing to send the whole installation into disarray,” he says.
“You have to start with a good design, which means including a ﬂoor waste. A lot of people even decide to hide the ﬂoor waste behind the toilet because otherwise it takes away from the aesthetics of the bathroom – but in reality, getting the water to drain behind a toilet is very diﬃcult.”
In line with modern trends, hobless showers can also present problems when waterprooﬁng. One continuous wall ﬁnish – particularly if there is no full shower screen – means that the water itself can escape the enclosure much easier. Connection detailing between a bath and the surrounding tiles between the wall and ﬂoor is also important.
“We see that in showers where the base and the wall have a failure, or the wall to wall detailing has a failure,” Barry explains. “It is also common on balconies where they connect to the buildings through the door threshold or through the window and that fails. We see failure between sheet joints on ﬂoors because they are not properly supported. These are the main problem areas.”
Angus notes that a classic example of where waterprooﬁng work is brought into jeopardy is when doorstops are ﬁxed to the bathroom ﬂoor to prevent the handle breaking the tile in full height tiled bathrooms.
“The problem occurs when someone screws the doorstop through the ﬂoor and straight through the waterprooﬁng membrane. You can buy doorstops that are ﬁxed to the tile and not the ﬂoor – so that’s a simple thing to avoid.
“It’s about starting oﬀ with a clear and simple design, taking into account the defects that we know are happening in this area, detailing accordingly and putting some thought in the most appropriate materials to use.”
BEST PRACTICE FOR WATERPROOFING
Clearly, there is a wide and varied range of waterprooﬁng membranes that can be applied to any building. However, Angus suggests that, ﬁrst, it is best to use a ﬁbre cement-based ﬂooring product for the substrate, which can be found in the CSR product line alongside many other reputable manufacturers.
“That way if there is a leak, the defect will be around the leak only and not move into the structure of the building as the ﬁbre cement product won’t deteriorate. It’s also very stable because those materials don’t move around a lot. If the substrate is square, the building won’t move and you won’t get a breakdown in waterprooﬁng membranes between moving ﬂoors and walls.”
Given the wide option of waterprooﬁng products available, Angus says it is essential to consider the compatibility of your chosen waterprooﬁng membrane with surrounding materials, including the substrate and ﬁnishes.
“It’s one area where people often try to save a bit of money. I recommend that you use the best product you can aﬀord to use. Spending a little more money upfront for a more reputable product will save you a lot more in rectiﬁcation costs to ﬁ x defects down the track.
“If it’s not waterproof, the cost to ﬁ x it will far outweigh the initial cost. And you typically only ﬁnd out if something isn’t waterproof after the house is ﬁnished and the client has moved in.”
Given the easy access to manufacturer detailing and notes on the installation of their products, as well as the requirements within the NCC, Australian Standards or statespeciﬁc requirements, it may be tempting for builders to do the waterprooﬁng themselves. However, both Barry and Angus recommend using a licensed waterproofer to do the job, as most states now require a certiﬁcate of installation to be provided by the contractor to show that the work complies.
Given this, Barry says that many builders who choose to become a licensed waterproofer will contact the AIW to put them in touch with relevant courses through Registered Training Organisations.
“I think to do the job you should have a trained, professional waterproofer who is certiﬁed and licensed to do and apply waterprooﬁng. The builder needs to understand the methodology of how waterprooﬁng is applied and how to prepare the substrate and prepare the building itself to receive the waterprooﬁng. Builders and certainly waterproofers do have to understand movement and the control of movement in buildings, so we need to train them to understand that,” he says.
“We need to produce more of these courses. Certiﬁcate III only covers an initial, minor detail on waterprooﬁng and we need to produce more training courses so tradespeople can up-skill and learn more about waterprooﬁng. The Association is currently working on that.”
You could say that waterprooﬁng is a black and white trade, simply because something is either waterproof, or it’s not. As Angus summarises: you should plan for the worst and hope for the best.
“Always think of the worst possible outcome and design around it. If you do have issues or problems, it’s best to ask advice before you start the work, rather than trying to ﬁ x it after it has been completed.”