Previous Page  17 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 17 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

BUILDING CONNECTION

SUMMER 2016 17

will be broken down and compromised by solvent based

adhesives through plasticiser migration out of the

adhesive. This occurs over time and is catalysed by

moisture and heat. What better place to find moisture and

heat than the floor and lower wall areas of a shower.

2. Abrasive damage to membranes by vinyl installers - This

occurs when installers attempt to take out imperfections

in the brush or roller applied membrane finish, to provide a

level and even surface for vinyl installation. Some will slice

off, or grind back ridges and high spots. Other damage

occurs as vinyl installers cut joints for welding in-situ,

such as butterfly corners, directly onto membranes.

3. Moisture build up beneath vinyls where negative pressures

result in membrane failure and adhesive failure - One of

the reasons that we are required to waterproof beneath

vinyl is the presence and build-up of condensation beneath

the vinyl. Hot water to the surface, and cool substrates and

cavities beneath the vinyl result in condensation forming

which can blister membranes and lift solvent based

adhesives. This is why installers of laminate linings and

acrylic sanitary shell products leave the bottom wall/tray

joint open for drainage and silicone seal the top sheet joint

to minimise steam going down behind the sheets. Wall

sheeting is adhesive fixed by applying separated vertical

runs of adhesive, to allow for drainage.

The solution to avoid all of these defects is to install a

complete and compatible membrane/vinyl lining system.

A material compatibility chain, preferably from a single

manufacturer, will go a long way to avoiding compatibility

issues. Documenting of this compatibility chain, as part of the

waterproofing application certificate, is one way to control

this. Builders and project managers should ensure that the

compatibility chain is followed by all, through stage inspections.

A suggested compatibility chain and sequence of

construction is as follows. This should be sought and

documented in writing by your material manufacturer, as a

site specification:

i. Bonded screed to substrate with falls as required by AS

3740. Bonding agent either to be applied beneath screed or

an additive mixed into the screed to form a fully bonded bed.

ii. Negative pressure membrane (possibly a hydro epoxy)

applied to moisture laden green screed. This will avoid

delays in the construction process and resistance to

moisture building up in the screed, from blistering the

topical membrane.

iii.Class III water based membrane to full floor and

appropriate wall application, compatible with finishes and

coverings. This must be accompanied by the appropriate

connector sealants and bond breakers with release zones.

iv.Cementitious feather coat with bonding additive,

to ensure full bond to membrane. This removes

imperfections in the membrane finish and an isolation

6

6:

CodeMark Certificate of Conformity.

Contact:

Andrew is a registered builder in Queensland, N.S.W and

Tasmania, a Cert III Wall and Floor Tiler and Forensic Tiling

Defect Investigator. His company, Armont Rectification

Builders, specialise in solving waterproofing and tiling

defects throughout the country, and are the owners of the

Tile Reglue Injection Method. T.R.I.M is a specialised service

to positively refix loose floor and wall tiles without removal.

material to protect the membrane from abrasive damage,

including cutting of butterfly corners.

v. Negative pressure hydro epoxy to moisture laden green

feather compound. This provides a stable substrate for

solvent based adhesives, isolates the membrane from

solvent adhesive contact, and resists moisture build up in

the feather screed from lifting the solvent based adhesive.

vi.Solvent based adhesive with the required adhesive

contact coverage by the manufacturer.

Steps iv and v should be applied to all areas expecting

contact between the membrane and solvent vinyl glue.

This would include the walls where vinyl may be coved or

other finishes such as lamipanel requiring the application of

incompatible solvent adhesives.

In conclusion, don’t believe rhetoric that is lacking

supportive evidence. Assess the material protective

requirements as specified by the BCA and match these to

the selected welded vinyl. If components require waterproof

protection, and the selected vinyl is only water resistant,

then a compatible waterproofing system needs to be

installed.

It falls onto the shoulders of the builder/surveyor/

certifier/council inspector to READ and ASSESS the

Performance Solution. Protect the building owner and

yourselves from non-compliant Building Solutions.

If it’s not supported in writing, then it’s not true!